| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
sensorypulse
Joined: 30 Mar 2006 Posts: 2
|
Post subject: Maitre d'Oeuvre - big problem |
|
|
Hi there
We are living in La Rochelle, and have just had two apartments built on land adjoining our home.
To ensure that we got through the minefield of paperwork and legislation without hitches, we employed a maitre d'oeuvre to draw up plans, submit them (via an architect) to the Mairie, and oversee the project.
We insisted from the start on going through all the correct channels for the work, and timed the construction immaculately to be ready for holiday rentals this summer.
The plans were accepted, but it was soon noticed that the architect she had employed had altered (without consulting us) the width of one of the buildings. She told us we would have to submit a modification request to reduce the building by 0.65 cm in width to return the building to the size we had envisaged at the start. She informed us this was a minor change, and that the work could go ahead in full anticipation of the modification being accepted.
This week, she has informed us that the "Batiments de France" have picked up that, for the height of the building, the proposed width in the demande de modification (the version of the construction that is now completed and standing on the ground next to our house) is not in accordance with building regulations and that the construction is "a revoir" (to be reviewed). This might mean making major structural changes such as removing the roof and lowering the height of the building, or demolishing all of the offending part.
In her contract, it states that her responsibilities as Maitre d'Oeuvre include "vérification de la conformité des documents d'exécution d'entreprises avec les documents contractuels, visa des plans" and "vérification de la conformité des ouvrages avec les stipulations du marché : réunions de coordination, inspections périodiques ou inopinées du chantier, controle de l'avancement des travaux".
This morning, we have received a lettre recommandé from her attempting to absolve herself of all responsibility for the project, saying her work is complete and we should be happy with it.
She says that according to the contract, she cannot be held responsible for the architect's error, and that any illegalities in the construction are no longer her problem.
What do we do?
All advice most welcome.
Jeremy Millington |
|
Thu Mar 30, 2006 11:17 am
 |
|
 |
Jenny
Joined: 24 Feb 2006 Posts: 148
|
Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Jeremy and welcome to the forum
That sounds awful and I hope someone looking at this forum can help you sort it out. |
|
Fri Mar 31, 2006 11:34 am
 |
|
 |
Jenny
Joined: 24 Feb 2006 Posts: 148
|
|
Fri Mar 31, 2006 11:51 am
 |
|
 |
Jenny
Joined: 24 Feb 2006 Posts: 148
|
|
Fri Mar 31, 2006 11:58 am
 |
|
 |
sensorypulse
Joined: 30 Mar 2006 Posts: 2
|
Post subject: |
|
|
You are all very helpful, and I thank you so kindly.
I am very pleased to say that this story has ended well, and quite unexpectedly quickly.
We sent a fax yesterday evening to the Batiments de France office in La Rochelle expressing our profuse apologies for any inadvertant contravention on our part of French building legislation in the buildings we have created.
We were phoned this morning and invited straight down to the office to meet the architect of the batiments de France.
We went armed with photos and plans, and met the gentleman in question, who was very pleasant, and when we explained things again in person, he told us straightaway that he would not bother us any further with this problem. He signed his official authorisation on the spot, effectively passing the building there and then.
So for us, a successful conclusion, and how lucky we suddenly feel to live and operate in a country where the personal touch still works.
Thanks again for all your help.
Take care
Jeremy |
|
Fri Mar 31, 2006 12:48 pm
 |
|
 |
Marcus
Joined: 31 Mar 2006 Posts: 121 Location: Lyon VII
|
Post subject: |
|
|
Good news for you... You can't imagine the amount of problem that peaple face when they try to build something in France ! It must be the reason why we (the French) used to live in old houses  _________________ Semper Fidelem |
|
Fri Mar 31, 2006 12:56 pm
 |
|
 |
Jenny
Joined: 24 Feb 2006 Posts: 148
|
Post subject: |
|
|
I'm glad it's all been sorted now.  |
|
Mon Apr 03, 2006 12:13 pm
 |
|
 |
|